Archive for September, 2008

Introducing Terrible and Terrific Tuesdays!

Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

Today we’re introducing a new weekly feature on our blog called “Terrible and Terrific Tuesdays.” Each Tuesday, we choose one usability topic or concept, and discuss one terrible and one terrific example of that topic.

This Week’s Topic: Credibility

Credibility on the web is something that is challenging on different levels for small companies and large companies alike. Small companies need to build credibility and establish themselves on the web to gain user trust while large companies need to reinforce their well known brands online. Usability issues on websites can harm credibility for both causes. On the web, we need to really think about how user experiences affects how the user perceives the credibility of the website.

Terrible


Blatant advertisements, overwhelming homepage, fly out menus, and other strange violations of usability best practices make this site our first Terrible Tuesday. Although the brand itself is strong, the design of this website does not give the impression of something that is updated, secure, or reliable. A good place to start would be to fix the most basic usability issues, such as the three level fly out navigation menu.

Terrific


A simple homepage that looks clean, updated, and follows basic usability standards helps reinforce a simple flight booking process and user experience. Rather than overwhelming the user with too many choices, the site uses a task-based information architecture that helps guides users to the right place.

Check back on Friday for our post talking more about how to establish trust and credibility on your website, and also for something I like to call the Credibility Cake!(™).

In the mean time, let us know what you think about the Terrible and Terrific of the day!

Usability News Roundup – September, 2008

Friday, September 26th, 2008

Every month I try to give a roundup of useful and important articles happening in the user experience domain. Here are some of the good article roundups for the month of September:

Design for Emotion and Flow September Issue, 2008, Boxes and Arrows
This article addresses how to appeal to user’s emotion as well as creating better flow on your website.

Using Online Videos to Engage Your UsersSeptember Issue, 2008, WebCredible
From OMS yesterday, I had an in depth conversation about how online videos will shape the future of the web as bandwidth becomes bigger and bigger, as computers move from our desktops into our pockets, and as the web becomes more ubiquitous.

Store Finders and Locators - September 15, 2008, Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox
A good article by Jakob on how users forage for location information. Essentially, users rely on search engines for this task reaffirming my prediction that SEO is becoming more pervasive in Usability.

Look At It Another WaySeptember 09, 2008, A List Apart
As usability practitioners, this is what we do almost every day- we embrace the user’s life. The only way to really understand a user is to breath the same air s/he breaths, to dig down into the nitty-gritty in order to convey the right messaging and providing the right content. This article hits close to my heart as it really sheds light on how we approach problem solving as usability practitioners.

I hope everyone enjoys these articles and have a great weekend.

The Most Usable Website

Friday, September 19th, 2008

At conferences, a frequent question I get is “What is the best website?” or “What is the most usable website?” When faced with this question, it’s always difficult for me to give a direct answer. The reason? I don’t think there is one.

Usually In response to that question, I take the Socratic Method, asking, “For what?” For every website I’ve seen I can point out at least a few things that could be a minor or major usability issue (guess because it’s my job), but a usable website goes far beyond the best practices and minimal standards and heuristics that I can assess from looking at a website for five minutes.

Not One Size Fits All

If I tell people that site “XYZ” is a good website, I’ll end up seeing a hundred “XYZ” copy-cats coming back and asking me why their conversion rates are not higher and why their customers are not finding the site easier to use, even though all they did was slap their logo on site “XYZ” design.

The reason for this is because the factors that make one website usable may not necessarily work for another website (excluding the minimal standards and best practices). We like to refer to the minimal standards and best practices as the foundation for the site, but user testing is what refines the site and makes it unique and usable for that site’s specific users. The foundation is of course is extremely important, but the refinement is what sets the site apart from others. However, one without the other results in an incomplete site, which explains why taking the foundation from one site and implementing it into another does not magically result in a usable website.

Every website has different goals and different audiences, and building a website without considering these factors is a flawed but common mistake. It is important to determine the personas of users visiting your site and to tailor the nomenclature, information architecture, design, functionality, and content to these audiences.

Technology and People Change

Another reason why one website will never be the “most usable website” is because technology and people’s experience with technology is ever evolving. Ten years ago we were concerned with 800 x 600 pixel monitor resolutions, “web safe” colors, frames, scrolling text, blue hyperlinks, and pop-up windows.

Some of these concerns still exist today, but technology has advanced to a point where 800 x 600 is no longer the norm, and “web safe” colors are not really a concern. Online behavior and experience has reduced the need for links to be blue (they can just be a distinct color), and pop-up windows are actually preferred for non-web documents such as PDFs (Jakob Nielsen, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/open_new_windows.html).

Designer and developer awareness of usability has also almost completely eliminated the use of frames and scrolling text on the web. It is because of these reasons that usability focuses have changed over the years and will continue to in the future.

Do you think there is a website that is “perfect” in terms of usability?

How to Sell Customer Experience to Your Execs and Upper Managers

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

This is a question I get asked most often during my speaking engagements- how do you make a case for improving the user experience? Today, I’m going to provide you all (ok, well, not all but enough) resources and techniques to help you affect this change.

1) Demonstrate ROI for Usability and social media to improve the customer experience. There are many resources and papers that demonstrate ROI for usability:

ROI 1 – Business Benefits of Usability

ROI 2 – How Ebay Measured ROI

ROI 3 – Usability Case Studies

ROI 4 – 24 Page White Paper Full of Case Studies

ROI 5 – How the American Council on Exercise Improved Their Conversions 43%

ROI 6 – Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox Article on Usability ROI

Here are resources and papers that demonstrate soft ROI for social media:

ROI 1 – Barry Tallis’s Presentation: How Nike, CNN, and Bank of America Measured Their Social Media Success

ROI 2 – General Motors’ ROI on Blogging Case Study

ROI 3 – Dell’s Regeneration Graffiti Facebook Campaign

ROI 4 – Sony’s Facebook Widget Vampire Campaign

One of the reasons you won’t see an abundance of papers explicating the ROI of social media is because it is still very new. If you imagine how long it takes to fully roll out a website (from 6 months to 2 years), putting together a social media plan and executing on it takes about the same amount of time. On top of that, you have to accurately track the success of your website or social media plan. In order to do this, you have to wait another year to get accurate tracking data. All in all, this process takes anywhere between 1.5 years to 3 years. Those who have demonstrated success so far are the early adopters of social media, allowing them to create informative white papers like the ones I’ve linked above.

2) Send your execs and members from other departments (ie. engineers, designers, and web team, etc.) to an educational conference. This method accomplishes two things:

First, it allows your engineers to get on the same page as you are regarding the vision of the website. This way, those internally are also defenders of the initiative thereby making it harder for an executive to refuse when so many are on board with a certain plan.

Second, they are hearing it from someone other than yourself. When someone hears the same information from industry experts, it lends more credibility to your position, takes away animosity from yourself, and lastly allows them to ask the questions directly to a credible source.

3) Hire an outside consultant to conduct a usability / social media analysis. The reasons for this are very similar to that of sending your execs and other departments to conferences. However, it might be more effective since it takes less traveling and less time commitment.

It’s easier to get a CEO to sit in on a 2 – 3 hour presentation at their office than getting them to drive or fly to a conference. Also, a diagnostic / analysis will be catered to your company’s specific needs versus a general presentation that might or might not apply specifically to your situation. And lastly, in some cases, it might be more cost effective. For example, our company charges anywhere between $10k to $20k for a usability diagnostic. Most conferences cost about $1,500 for registration plus another $1,000 or so for flight, hotel, and meals. Therefore, if you want to send about 5 people, it will cost $12,500 for the full conference. Of course there are exceptions to this rule such as the OMS Tour in which the conference is local and very inexpensive for 5 people to attend.

So, these are all the techniques that I have come up with. Do you have any other techniques to justify a business case for increasing the customer experience? If so, please share it!